| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bryan Reeves Laza-tiger
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Posts: 1126 Location: Central Illinois
|
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:17 pm Post subject: |
#38544 |
|
| Joseph wrote: | Now here’s my logline again. Please tell me what you think?
In a future where humanity is close to extinction, an estranged anthropologist finds herself caught between the demands of a joint mission and the needs of a primitive tribe. |
Consider changing your protagonist. Irony in the logline also encompasses the least likely protagonist for the conflict. In this current phase of your logline, we expect an anthropologist to be able to deal with primitive cultures better than a journalist, for example.
Without going the comedic route, what could you do with theme and your story if the protagonist was like a Martha Stewart-type or a computer hacker? I'm seeing someone who is a high-and-dry fish out of water in a primitive culture.
In a fleet designed to ferry human genes past extinction, there will need to be some beautiful women and handsome men. Our descendants will need to add those genes into the mix.
_________________ "The standard doesn't change."-Mike Tomlin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Joseph Puma

Joined: 22 Jun 2010 Posts: 82 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:47 am Post subject: |
#38558 |
|
Okay, so here it is: the Basic Idea.
Two thousand years after the Earth is struck by a giant comet, a faction of an international fleet of human survivors awakens from stasis to find the rest of the fleet missing. After setting out in search of the fleet they encounter a tribe of warriors that attack and capture them. With their lives endangered, the crew befriends a defiant matriarch warrior who helps them to escape, only to then realize that their captors are descendants of the missing fleet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Joseph Puma

Joined: 22 Jun 2010 Posts: 82 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:39 am Post subject: |
#38566 |
|
| So, I'm guessing by the lack of response to my last post, my basic idea is basically crap. Is there no point me going on with it? Can I have a list of what elements you'd remove or change? I'm kind of stuck as to what to do. I'm thinking that the black vet syndrome doesn't just affect my protagonist, but also the plot. What am I doing wrong?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Hollywood crAZRick Snarky Cat

Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1645
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:27 am Post subject: |
#38568 |
|
too much backstory, not enough compelling story to play with
the story is what happens when they return to Earth and find the primatives who turn out to be the missing fleet... everything before that you can cut
you won't
but you could
write on!
 _________________ Snarky is the new Black... with a VAMPIRE! ;-)
www.jeffkitchen.com for all your outlining Q&A... it's tight! and tighter is righter! right?... with a VAMPIRE! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Joseph Puma

Joined: 22 Jun 2010 Posts: 82 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:22 am Post subject: |
#38569 |
|
I'm having a screenplay crisis! I'm not ruling out anything right now. Even the story with the primitive has a lot of back story. Now I'm thinking there's a story with the primitives and there's a story with the fleet.
I'm going to see how they work alone (with their back story) and together (minus the back story).
The feedback I've received has upset the screenplay's equilibrium. As hard as it is for me to deal with, I can't just ignore it.
I will let you know of any further progress.
Thanks very much for your help
Joseph
|
|
| Back to top |
|
RobbRoss Siberian Tiger
Joined: 04 Jan 2012 Posts: 334
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:43 am Post subject: |
#38570 |
|
You're too tangled in the story at this point. It's a common issue so step away from it for a few months. Work on something different and then re-approach this idea with a fresh perspective.
You need to answer- Why am I writing this? What is the kernel of this idea that makes me want to spend my time and energy on growing it? What was the original spark of the idea? What part of this idea is different than previous movies? Don't answer here, this is your private work.
If you're still stuck, write a bunch of loglines focusing on different parts of your idea. It's you asking yourself, What if this? and What if that? One with the primitives, one without, one with this kind of protagonist, etc. This is your own exercise, not that you should post all the logs here.
Re-read the logline section of the first book and complete its exercises. Did you do this when it was first suggested early in the week? Now you should re-read all the books. The exercises are important as just reading is not enough. You sound committed so accept that this kind of work is part of the process.
Also read screenplays, some from produced movies and some specs.
Follow the steps of Logline->BS2->Board->Script. If I hear again that you're jumping ahead, if you're not helping yourself, then I won't bother helping again.
Good luck.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Hollywood crAZRick Snarky Cat

Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1645
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:09 pm Post subject: |
#38575 |
|
Inistitutionalized stories are some of the most difficult to write because they are most difficult to plot, since there are seemingly so many more compelling aspects to deal with than a 'regular' DWAP-- Dude, Problem, life or death complication
Institutionalized stories involve the few vs the many, a loner vs a group but you have to have enough dynmaics between all members of the group to keep the group fresh and more than one-dimensional, so you have to devote time in the story to fleshing out your fleeters and your primatives befrore the fleeters, as well as you hero shippers and your lone heroine anthropologist... lots to juggle, so it seems appropriate that it would take lots of balls to get it done right, right??
start with the simplest form of the logline:
A determined but disoriented astro-anthropologist's conflicting mission: defy her crew or eradicate hostile primative remnants of post-apocalyptic Earth. 18 words
if that sets the story up, then start beating it out...
using your model of the basic story...
| Code: | | Two thousand years after the Earth is struck by a giant comet, a faction of an international fleet of human survivors awakens from stasis to find the rest of the fleet missing. After setting out in search of the fleet they encounter a tribe of warriors that attack and capture them. With their lives endangered, the crew befriends a defiant matriarch warrior who helps them to escape, only to then realize that their captors are descendants of the missing fleet. |
consider the Planet of the Apes (1968) model:
| Code: | | Two thousand years after leaving Earth to explore the far reaches of space, a small crew of human astronauts awaken from stasis to find themselves crash landed and drowning on a strange planet. After setting out in search of life and sustenance, they encounter a tribe of primative mute and docile humans, who are subsequently attacked by talking apes! With lives in danger, the crew befriends a defiant matriarch chimpanzee psychiatrist and her mate an anthropologist chimp, who help the survivor escape, only to lead to the discovery that their ape captors are some how descendants of human Earthlings. |
POTA starts in space, a 7 to 10 minute scene aboard the spaceship, where Taylor ruminates before bed time... he's alone, even amongst his slumbering crew of 3-- Landon, Dodge and Stewart, the mission's Eve-- Taylor is a loner
Theme stated: Has Man finally stopped waging war against his brother? And, if not, is there something in the universe better than man?
the Catalyst forces the remainder of the action of the story to happen on the planet, as the ship crashes into the sea beyond the forbidden zone
Fun and Games is the crew searching for water, finding the swimming hole, finding the primatives, encountering the apes, being hunted and abducted as slaves if not murdered by the talking gorilla army, returned to the village, where Taylor meets friendly chips Zira and Cornelius, and wary keeper of the faith orangutan Dr Zaius.
Midpoint is Taylor's escape from custody and the revealing reversal and revelation that Taylor can TALK! no humans can talk, only apes can talk! OMG!
BGCI is Zaius and the gorilla's growing fear and hatred for what Taylor may represent, a rebel anomaly, who might start the humans to rise up against the apes, which might be bad for all apekind, so it's decided that Taylor will be neutered and then lobotomized if not killed for sport..
All is Lost, Taylor is doomed, so he cries a little bit to his mute mate Nova.
But his Dark Night of the Soul is short, as the chimps help Taylor to escape once more.
The Finale is the chimps leading Taylor to the caves in the Forbidden Zone, to help Taylor find proof that man existed before apes.
The Final Image is Taylor, alone again except for his new Eve, Nova, realizing he's come back to Earth all along; man may have stopped warring against man, but not before they destroyed themselves and allowed apes to rise up and rule
how would your story fit the BS2 model laid out by POTA?
can it? it doesnt seem like it fits... but I'll try to mess with your story points after I get home from work tonight..._________________ Snarky is the new Black... with a VAMPIRE! ;-)
www.jeffkitchen.com for all your outlining Q&A... it's tight! and tighter is righter! right?... with a VAMPIRE! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Joseph Puma

Joined: 22 Jun 2010 Posts: 82 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject: |
#38579 |
|
Robb, thanks for your help on this. I’ll certainly consider everything you’ve said. You sound to me like you’re the boss. I feel like a pupil having been reproved.
I’ve been thinking about what’s been discussed and today decided to split the story just to see what I had and how they might work alone. I created a logline for each.
A defiant matriarch warrior struggles to protect the local tribeswomen from their marauding men-folk and sadistic chieftain - her mate.
In a post-apocalyptic Earth, a determined anthropologist and her crew go in search of a missing fleet on a mission to save humanity from extinction.
It’s interesting seeing the story like this: split and yet so much clearer than how I was seeing it before. I can see what you mean by Black Vet. There are clearly two A stories going on in my screenplay. I’m not going to pretend to be surprised by that. I was determined to flesh out the major characters and give them their own story. But what’s happened is that I’ve created a split personality fighting to control the mind, in this case my screenplay. I am surprised, however, to discover that what I thought was the B story (the defiant matriarch) is more complete from the logline than the A story (the search for the fleet), which is missing an antagonist. But then the sadistic chieftain is the antagonist.
This, of course, has caused me to wonder whether I am concentrating on the right story, and if I am, whether I do have the right protagonist, despite my conviction before. Looking at these two loglines, there is much more happening with the defiant matriarch warrior. She is clearly more involved in her story than the determined anthropologist is in hers. There is no conflict in the anthropologist logline. In the screenplay there is no conflict for the crew until they encounter the tribe of warriors in Break into Two. Act One is mainly setup and the sub-plot (memory loss), which offers the only conflict. The matriarch, on the other hand, experiences conflict immediately in her story without a sub-plot to provide the action.
Of the two, I would choose to stick with the matriarch logline. But if I am to continue with the story with both loglines blended together, it would have to look something like this, I think:
A determined anthropologist fights to stay alive in a post-apocalyptic Earth when her crew is captured by primitive descendants of their missing fleet.
And for it to work I would probably have to remove not just the memory loss sub-plot but also the conflicting parallel A story that involves the matriarch.
I’ll go away and think about it for a while, or step away, as you suggest, and not think about it.
CrazyRick, right!! It would take a lot of balls. But I would want to flesh them out. One dimensional characters in a film is one of my pet hates. The male characters in my story, particularly the fleeters, are one dimensional, and I need to look at that more closely. Ripley said it right in Aliens: “I feel like kind of a fifth wheel around here. Is there anything I can do?” They’re not really doing much at all.
| Code: | consider the Planet of the Apes (1968) model:
Two thousand years after leaving Earth to explore the far reaches of space, a small crew of human astronauts awaken from stasis to find themselves crash landed and drowning on a strange planet. After setting out in search of life and sustenance, they encounter a tribe of primative mute and docile humans, who are subsequently attacked by talking apes! With lives in danger, the crew befriends a defiant matriarch chimpanzee psychiatrist and her mate an anthropologist chimp, who help the survivor escape, only to lead to the discovery that their ape captors are some how descendants of human Earthlings. |
I did actually deliberately set it up to follow a similar plot as Planet of the Apes, one of my most favourite films. And there are scenes I intend to include that pay homage to it, like the talking doll. But it kind of lost itself with all the back story.
I need to go through the BS2 again. But I don’t intend to touch that until I’ve figured out the logline. The beats do fit, or at least they did the last time I checked. The midpoint is when the protagonist reluctantly agrees to integrate into the tribe on behalf of her female crewmates in order to save the lives of the male crew members, whom the chieftain threatens to kill.
Thanks for all your help
Jospeh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
quade Liger

Joined: 12 Jun 2009 Posts: 1760 Location: South of the 605
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
#38581 |
|
| Joseph wrote: | | So, I'm guessing by the lack of response to my last post, my basic idea is basically crap. |
In my case, it had nothing to do with me making a judgement on the idea and everything with my availability.
In an earlier post, you asked about the importance of theme. To me, that's far more important than the idea. What it is you're attempting to say about the real world is, to me, the only valid reason for writing at all. If you're writing to become rich and famous, you're probably an idiot. Hopefully, that's none of us here. And that's not to say people don't become rich and famous by writing, but the odds of doing so are so small it's pure insanity to even think about doing it for that reason.
Having something to say, I think, is far more important.
Your story should reflect your best idea in attempting to get that message across and never simply be shoehorned into an idea picked simply because you think it's cool or spectacular or to ever follow what is currently popular.
There are 100,000 scripts written every year, but maybe only a handful which are thoughtfully made and contain an interesting message, yet don't slam their audience over the head with it. I think it's probably the hardest thing to get right. There's no formula for it.
"A determined anthropologist fights to stay alive in a post-apocalyptic Earth when her crew is captured by primitive descendants of their missing fleet."
So, what is it you're saying with your story?
Yes, we've talked about this before, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" but is this the best story possible to get that point across?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Bryan Reeves Laza-tiger
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Posts: 1126 Location: Central Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:36 pm Post subject: |
#38583 |
|
| quade wrote: | | In an earlier post, you asked about the importance of theme. To me, that's far more important than the idea. What it is you're attempting to say about the real world is, to me, the only valid reason for writing at all. |
Absolutely.
_________________ "The standard doesn't change."-Mike Tomlin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Joseph Puma

Joined: 22 Jun 2010 Posts: 82 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:01 am Post subject: |
#38585 |
|
Quade
I'm glad someone has acknowledged the theme issue I was beginning to have. I was really beginning to think that the theme of a story is not important at all. No one here has said that, but since starting this thread everything for me has been thrown up in the air, including the theme, which had really got my knickers in a twist.
I agree with your comments completely.
When I genuinely started thinking about changing the face of my story due to the feedback I was getting, removing elements that I considered to be integral to the plot, I realized the theme was being affected. At first I thought "OK, I'll just have to think of a different theme", but then it hit me. I suddenly realized why I had chosen that particular theme: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" or, as I am also wording it: "People have a duty to others as well as to themselves". I had chosen it because of an underlying theme that is essentially my life's theme, but a very common theme among people and in films: Identity. And when I realized that, I knew I couldn't just cast it aside. It was the one most single important element of my screenplay. It was what was driving the protagonist forward: the need to be who she is, an individual and not part of a collective, despite the fact that the lesson she needs to learn is that who she is as an individual should not be exclusive of others. But as Robb has pointed out, I have become so entangled in the story that I almost forgot why am I writing this?
I thought the plot I had was the best way of bringing it across, but now I'm not so sure. I need to "prune it", maybe "mutilate it", "reduce it to skeletal strength", "wipe out whole pages without even shedding a tear", and hopefully "get a masochistic pleasure out of it". - my mate Henry Miller, not me.
I'd like to think that I can salvage the protagonist through all of this. But she may not now be the best character to convey the theme. None of the crew are. So I'm looking at telling the story from the POV of the matriarch instead, who is better placed to contend with the ideas of individual and collective identity. Unless I reverse the theme and make the protagonist struggle for her individuality and independence, which can work too, but that is so pro our times, and won't challenge ideas.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Joseph Puma

Joined: 22 Jun 2010 Posts: 82 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:01 am Post subject: |
#38960 |
|
| Quote: | So, just to remind us and correct anything that's changed, this is the "sort of" Planet of the Apes type story where a group of people are cyrogenically frozen, thawed out, find out the world has changed and you want your protagonist to be the one who initially resists the idea of becoming a new "Eve" of civilization, but is convinced over the course of the story it's the right thing to do.
Is that correct?
Remind me again what the ultimate point of this story is supposed to be?
"Good of the many outweighs the good of the one"? |
Quade, that's the one.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|